Vol. 28 Núm. 97 (2023)
Investigación

HACIA UNA TEORÍA DE LA GOBERNANZA DE LA EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR: Análisis de la literatura especializada

Julio Labraña
Universidad de Tarapacá
Emilio Rodríguez-Ponce
Universidad de Tarapacá
Liliana Pedraja-Rejas
Universidad de Tarapacá

Publicado 2024-12-13

Palabras clave

  • Educación superior; autonomía universitaria; Estado; gobernanza, análisis documental.

Resumen

Este artículo explora las principales líneas de gobernanza de los sistemas de educación superior en la literatura de corriente principal (Web of Science) durante los últimos 10 años (2011–2020). El análisis muestra la primacía de tres discursos: 1) gobernanza como forma específica de conducción a distancia, desde el Estado, de la educación superior, 2) gobernanza como definiciones gubernamentales de política sobre educación superior y 3) gobernanza como conjunto de actores involucrados directa o indirectamente en la discusión de la organización de las actividades en las instituciones de educación superior. Con base en este análisis, se propone una definición integrada de gobernanza.

Citas

  1. Alexiadou, Nafsika y Van de Bunt-Kokhuis, Sylvia (2013). “Policy space and the governance of education: Transnational influences on institutions and identities in the Netherlands and the uk”, Comparative Education, vol. 49, núm. 3, pp. 344-360. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/03050068.2013.803750
  2. Antonowicz, Dominik; Kulczycki, Emanuel y Budzanowska, Anna (2020). “Breaking the deadlock of mistrust? A participative model of the structural reforms in higher education in Poland”, Higher Education Quarterly, vol. 74, núm. 4, pp. 391-409. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12254
  3. Austin, Ian (2019). “Governance architectures in higher education arising from extra information on learning outcomes”, Higher Education Policy, vol. 32, núm. 4, pp. 617-637. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-019-00166-w
  4. Barsoum, Ghada (2020). “When marketization encounters centralized governance: Private higher education in Egypt”, International Journal of Educational Development, vol. 76, pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102215
  5. Bleiklie, Ivan; Enders, Jürgen; Lepori, Benedetto y Musselin, Christine (2010). “New public management, network governance and the university as a changing professional organization”, en T. Christensen y P. Laegreid (eds.), The Ashgate research companion to new public management, Oxon: Routledge, pp. 161-176.
  6. Bragesjö, Fredrik; Elzinga, Aant y Kasperowski, Dick (2012). “Continuity or discontinuity? Scientific governance in the pre-history of the 1977 law of higher education and research in Sweden”, Minerva, vol. 50, núm. 1, pp. 65-96. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11024-012-9188-4
  7. Brunner, José Joaquín; Elacqua, Gregory; Tillett, Anthony; Bonnefoy, Javiera; González, Soledad; Pacheco, Paula y Salazar, Felipe (2005). Guiar el mercado. Informe sobre la educación superior en Chile, Santiago, Chile: Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez.
  8. Brunner, José Joaquín y Labraña, Julio (2020). “The transformation of higher education in Latin America: From elite access to massification and universalization”, en S. Schwartzman (ed.), Higher education in Latin America and the challenges of the 21st century, Nueva York: Springer Publishing, pp. 31-41.
  9. Brunner, José Joaquín; Labraña, Julio; Ganga, Francisco y Rodríguez-Ponce, Emilio (2020). “Gobernanza de la educación superior: el papel de las ideas en las políticas”, Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, vol. 83, núm. 1, pp. 211-238. https://doi.org/10.35362/ rie8313866
  10. Brunner, José Joaquín; Labraña, Julio; Rodríguez-Ponce, Emilio y Ganga, Francisco (2021). “Variedades de capitalismo académico: un marco conceptual de análisis”, Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, vol. 29, núm. 35, pp. 1-32. https://doi. org/10.14507/epaa.29.6245
  11. Chou, Meng-Hsuan; Kamola, Isaac y Pietsch, Tamson (eds.) (2016). The transnational politics of higher education: Contesting the global/transforming the local, Abingdon: Routledge.
  12. Clark, Burton R. (1986). The higher education system. Academic organization in cross-national perspective, Berkeley: University of California Press.
  13. Cone, Lucas Lundbye (2018). “Towards a university of Halbbildung: How the neoliberal mode of higher education governance in Europe is half-educating students for a misleading future”, Educational Philosophy and Theory, vol. 50, núm. 11, pp. 1020- 1030. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1341828
  14. De Boer, Harry; Enders, Jürgen y Jongbloed, Ben (2009). “Market governance in higher education”, en B. M. Kehm, J. Huisman y B. Stensaker (eds.), The European higher education area: Perspectives on a moving target, Leiden: Brill, pp. 61-78.
  15. Gaus, Nurdiana (2019). “Is State control in higher education governance always bad? New public management and the history of Indonesian higher education reform policy”, Asian Politics & Policy, vol. 11, núm. 2, pp. 294-313. https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.12462
  16. Jessop, Bob (2017). “Varieties of academic capitalism and entrepreneurial universities”, Higher Education, vol. 73, núm. 6, pp. 853-870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0120-6
  17. Khan, Parvez Alam; Johl, Satirenjit Kaur; Akhtar, Shakeb; Asif, Mohammad; Salameh, Anas A. y Kanesan, Thavamaran (2022). “Open Innovation of institutional investors and higher education system in creating open approach for sdg-4 quality education: A conceptual review”, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, vol. 8, núm. 1, pp. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010049
  18. Koch, Tomás y Labraña, Julio (2021). “What does it mean to assess quality? A socio-historical analytical of quality assurance in Chilean higher education”, en M. Murphy, C. Burke, C. Costa y R. Raaper (eds.), Social theory and the politics of higher education: Critical perspectives on institutional research, Londres: Bloomsbury, pp. 65-84.
  19. Labraña, Julio; Brunner, José Joaquín y Álvarez, Javier (2019). “Entre el centro cultural y la periferia organizacional: la educación superior en América Latina desde la teoría de sistemas-mundo de Wallerstein”, Estudios Públicos, vol. 156, pp. 130-141.
  20. Leemann, Regula Julia (2018). “Free movement of people and capital and the standard of transnational academic mobility: Principles of governance in the European Research Area”, European Educational Research Journal, vol. 17, núm. 6, pp. 857-876. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1474904118773946
  21. Liang, Wenyan; Gu, Jun y Nyland, Chris (2022). “China’s new research evaluation policy: Evidence from economics faculty of elite Chinese universities”, Research Policy, vol. 51, núm. 1, 104407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104407
  22. Macheridis, Nikos (2017). “Governance of higher education – implementation of project governance”, Tertiary Education and Management, vol. 23, núm. 2, pp. 85-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2016.1236285
  23. Magalhães, António; Veiga, Amélia; Ribeiro, Filipa M.; Sousa, Sofia y Santiago, Rui (2013). “Creating a common grammar for European higher education governance”, Higher Education, vol. 65, núm. 1, pp. 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9583-7
  24. Marginson, Simon (2010). “Higher education in the global knowledge economy”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 2, núm. 5, pp. 6962-6980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.05.049
  25. Mok, Ka Ho (2005). “Riding over socialism and global capitalism: Changing education governance and social policy paradigms in post‐Mao China”, Comparative Education, vol. 41, núm. 2, pp. 217-242. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060500036956
  26. Morgan, Clara y Shahjahan, Riyad A. (2014). “The legitimation of oecd’s global educational governance: Examining pisa and ahelo test production”, Comparative Education, vol. 50, núm. 2, pp. 192-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2013. 834559
  27. Naidoo, Rajani (2016). “The competition fetish in higher education: Varieties, animators and consequences”, British Journal of Sociology of Education, vol. 37, núm. 1, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2015.1116209
  28. Nisar, Muhammad Azfar (2015). “Higher education governance and performance based funding as an ecology of games”, Higher Education, vol. 69, núm. 2, pp. 289-302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9775-4
  29. oecd (2008). Benchmarking the governance of tertiary education systems, París: oecd Publishing.
  30. Rodríguez Gómez, Roberto (2017). “Más autonomía o más gobernanza. Un dilema universitario”, Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, vol. 22, núm. 75, pp. 1015-1020.
  31. Schmitter, Philippe C. (2019). “Defining, explaining and, then, exploiting the elusive concept of “governance”, Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. 12, núm. 4, pp. 547-567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-018-0236-9
  32. Scott, Peter (2019). “Martin Trow’s elite‐mass‐universal triptych: Conceptualising higher education development”, Higher Education Quarterly, vol. 73, núm. 4, pp. 496-506. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12224
  33. Scott, Peter; Gallacher, Jim y Parry, Gareth (2017). “Reflections and conclusions”, en P. Scott, J. Gallacher y G. Parry (eds.), New languages and landscapes of higher education, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 256-264.
  34. Smelser, Neil J. (2013). Dynamics of the contemporary university: Growth, accretion, and conflict, Berkeley: University of California Press.
  35. Song, Sue-Yeon (2020). “How does variation in the State’s choice over higher education governance affect university restructuring? A time-series-cross-sectional analysis”, Education and Urban Society, vol. 52, núm. 1, pp. 92-116. https://doi. org/10.1177/0013124519861948
  36. Welch, Anthony (2020). “Of worms and woodpeckers: Governance & corruption in East and Southeast Asian higher education”, Studies in Higher Education, vol. 45, núm. 10, pp. 2073-2081. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1823643
  37. Whitley, Richard (2011). “Changing governance and authority relations in the public sciences”, Minerva, vol. 49, núm. 4, pp. 359-385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024- 011-9182-2
  38. Wilcox, Kim (2021). “Interrogating the discourses of ‘teaching excellence’ in higher education”, European Educational Research Journal, vol. 20, núm. 1, pp. 42-58. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1474904120944783
  39. Woelert, Peter (2015). “Governing knowledge: The formalization dilemma in the governance of the public sciences”, Minerva, vol. 53, núm. 1, pp. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11024-015-9266-5
  40. World Bank (1992). Governance and development, Washington, d.c.: World Bank.
  41. Zajda, Joseph I. (ed.) (2020). Globalisation, ideology and neo-liberal higher education reforms. Globalisation, Comparative Education and Policy Research, Dordrecht: Springer.