Vol. 27 Núm. 95 (2022)
Investigación

“¿ESTE PROYECTO ME REPRESENTA O NO?” NEGOCIACIONES IDENTITARIAS EN ESTUDIANTES DOCTORALES: Dos estudios de caso

PDF XML
  • Lina Calle-Arango
Lina Calle-Arango
Universidad de O’Higgins

Publicado 2022-10-01

Palabras clave

  • Identidad; escritura académica; estudio de casos; formación doctoral.

Resumen

Este trabajo parte de la pregunta de investigación: ¿qué procesos de negociaciones identitarias relevan estudiantes de doctorado en su familiarización con nuevas prácticas letradas durante sus primeros dos años en el programa? Mediante un diseño cualitativo exploratorio e interpretativo de estudio de caso longitudinal, se documentan las experiencias de dos estudiantes chilenas en un programa doc­toral en Educación. Los resultados constatan que las participantes enfrentaron crisis y negociaciones identitarias a raíz del contraste entre las posibilidades de “ser” disponibles en el nuevo contexto y los valores sobre la escritura académica previamente desarrollados.

PDF XML

Citas

  1. Adamek, Margaret (2015). “Building scholarly writers: Student perspectives on peer review in a doctoral writing seminar”, Journal of Teaching in Social Work, vol. 35, núms. 1-2, pp. 213-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2014.995333
  2. Ávila Reyes, Natalia; Navarro, Federico y Tapia-Ladino, Mónica (2020). “Identidad, voz y agencia: claves para una enseñanza inclusiva de la escritura en la universidad”, Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, vol. 28, núm. 98, pp. 1-31. https://doi. org/10.14507/epaa.28.4722
  3. Ávila Reyes, Natalia; Calle-Arango, Lina y Léniz, Estrella (2022). “Researching in times of pandemic and social unrest: A flexible mindset for an enriched view on literacy”, International Studies in Sociology of Education, vol. 31, núms. 1-2, https://doi.org/ 10.1080/09620214.2021.1927142
  4. Barton, David y Hamilton, Mary (2004). “La literacidad entendida como práctica social”, en Zavala, Niño-Murcia y Ames (eds.), Escritura y sociedad. Nuevas perspectivas teóricas y etnográficas, Lima: Red para el Desarrollo de las Ciencias Sociales en el Perú, pp. 109-139.
  5. Bazerman, Charles (2013). “Comprendiendo un viaje que dura toda la vida: la evolución de la escritura”, Infancia y Aprendizaje, vol. 36, núm. 4, pp. 421-441. https://doi. org/10.1174/021037013808200320
  6. Berkenkotter, Carol; Huckin, Thomas y Ackerman, John (1988). “Conventions, conversations, and the writer: Case study of a student in a rethoric Ph.D. program”, Research in the Teaching of English, vol. 22, núm. 1, pp. 9-44.
  7. Boote, David y Beile, Penny (2005). “Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation”, Education Researcher, vol. 34, núm. 6, pp. 3-15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034006003
  8. Bordieu, Pierre (2001). Poder, derecho y clases sociales, 2a ed., Sevilla: Desclée de Brouwer.
  9. Brooke, Robert (1988). “Modeling a writer’s identity: Reading and imitation in the writing classroom”, College Composition and Communication, vol. 39, pp. 24-41. https://doi. org/10.2307/357814
  10. Calle-Arango, Lina y Ávila Reyes, Natalia (2020). “Alfabetización académica chilena: revisión de investigaciones de una década”, Literatura y Lingüística, vol. 41, pp. 455- 482. https://doi.org/10.29344/0717621X.41.2280
  11. Calle-Arango, Lina y Ávila Reyes, Natalia (2022). “Obstacles, facilitators, and needs in doctoral writing: A systematic review”, Studies in Continuing Education, https://doi. org/10.1080/0158037X.2022.2026315
  12. Castelló, Montserrat; Iñesta, Anna y Monereo, Carles (2009). “Towards self-regulated academic writing: An exploratory study with graduate students in a situated learning environment”, Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, vol. 7, núm. 3, pp. 1107-1130. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v7i19.1336
  13. Castelló, Montserrat; McAlpine, Lynn; Sala-Bubaré, Anna; Inouye, Kelsey y Skakni, Isabelle (2021). “What perspectives underlie ‘researcher identity’? A review of two decades of empirical studies”, Higher Education, vol. 81, pp. 567-590. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10734-020-00557-8
  14. Choi, Yoon; Bouwma-Gearhart, Jana y Ermis, Grant (2021). “Doctoral students’ identity development as scholars in the education sciences: Literature review and implications”, International Journal of Doctoral Studies, vol. 16, pp. 89-125. https:// doi.org/10.28945/4687
  15. Chois, Pilar y Jaramillo, Luis (2016). “La investigación sobre la escritura en posgrado: estado del arte”, Lenguaje, vol. 44, núm. 2, pp. 227-259. Disponible en: http://www. scielo.org.co/pdf/leng/v44n2/v44n2a05.pdf
  16. Ciampa, Katia y Wolfe, Zora (2020). “From isolation to collaboration: Creating an intentional community of practice within the doctoral dissertation proposal writing process”, Teaching in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.18 22313
  17. Dávila, Mabel (2012). “Tendencias internacionales en posgrados”, Integración y Conocimiento, vol. 1, pp. 18-26. Disponible en: https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/ integracionyconocimiento/article/view/5630
  18. Fazel, Ismaeil y Shi, Ling (2015). “Citation behaviors of graduate students in grant proposal writing”, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 20, pp. 203-214. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.10.002
  19. Fisher, R.; Brock, C.; Frahm, T.; Van Wig, A. y Gillis, V. (2020). “Reflections on writing and identity: Exploring the role of qualifying exams in the sociocultural development of doctoral students”, Studies in Continuing Education, vol. 42, núm. 3, pp. 365-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2019.1661237
  20. Fishman, Jenn (2012). “Longitudinal writing research in (and for) the twenty-first century”, en L. Nickoson y M. Sheridan (eds.), Writing Studies Research in Practice. Methods and Methodologies, Illinois: Southern Illinois University Press, pp. 171-182.
  21. Gadamer, Hans-Georg (2001). Antología, Salamanca: Sígueme.
  22. Inouye, Kelsey y McAlpine, Lynn (2017). “Developing scholarly identity: Variation in agentive responses to supervisor feedback”, Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, vol. 14, núm. 2, pp. 1-19. Disponible en: http://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol14/ iss2/3
  23. Inouye, Kelsey y McAlpine, Lynn (2019). “Developing academic identity: A review of the literature on doctoral writing and feedback”, International Journal of Doctoral Studies, vol. 14, pp. 1-31. https://doi.org/10.28945/4168
  24. Ivanič, Roz (1998). Writing and identity. The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing, Amsterdam: Lancaster University.
  25. Jalongo, Mary; Boyer, Wanda y Ebbeck, Marjory (2014). “Writing for scholarly publication as ‘tacit knowledge’: A qualitative focus group study of doctoral students in education”, Early Childhood Education Journal, vol. 42, núm. 4, pp. 241-250. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10643-013-0624-3
  26. Kvale, Steinar (1996). The interviews. An introduction to qualitative research interviewing, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  27. Lassig, Carly; Dillon, Lisette y Diezmann, Carmel (2013). “Student or scholar? Transforming identities through a research writing group”, Studies in Continuing Education, vol. 35, núm. 3, pp. 299-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2012.746226
  28. Levecque, Katia; Anseel, Frederik; De Beuckelaer, Alain; Van der Heyden, Johan y Gisle, Lydia (2017). “Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students”, Research Policy, vol. 46, núm. 4, pp. 868-879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. respol.2017.02.008
  29. Lillis, Theresa (2001). Student writing: Access, regulation, desire, Londres: Routledge.
  30. Lillis, Theresa (2008). “Ethnography as method, methodology, and ‘deep theorizing’: Closing the gap between text and context in academic writing research”, Written Communication, vol. 25, núm. 3, pp. 353-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088308319229
  31. Lillis, Theresa (2013). Sociolinguistics of writing, Edimburgo: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139164597.013
  32. Liu, Fangtong; Du, Jianxia; Zhou, Danny y Huang, Bosu (2020) “Exploiting the potential of peer feedback: The combined use of face-to-face feedback and e-feedback in doctoral writing groups”, Assessing Writing, vol. 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. asw.2020.100482
  33. Locke, Leslie y Boyle, Melanie (2016). “Avoiding the A.B.D. Abyss: A grounded theory study of a dissertation-focused course for doctoral students in an educational leadership program”, The Qualitative Report Article, vol. 21, núm. 9, pp. 1574-1593. https://doi. org/10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2167
  34. Lonka, Kirsti; Chow, Angela; Keskinen, Jenni; Hakkarainen, Kai; Sandström, Niclas y Pyhältö, Kirsi (2014). “How to measure PhD students’ conceptions of academic criting - and are they related to well-being?”, Journal of Writing Research, vol. 5, núm. 3, pp. 245-269. https://doi.org/10.1145/2674005.2674995
  35. Lonka, Kirsti; Ketonen, Elina; Vekkaila, Jenna; Cerrato Lara, Maria y Pyhältö, Kirsi (2019). “Doctoral students’ writing profiles and their relations to well-being and perceptions of the academic environment”, Higher Education, vol. 77, núm. 4, pp. 587-602. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0290-x
  36. Maddox, Sarah (2017). Did not finish: Doctoral attrition in higher education and student affairs, Greeley: University of Northern Colorado.
  37. Merriam, Sharan (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCI.0b013e3181edd9b1
  38. Muga, Alfonso (2018). “Desafíos para el aseguramiento de la calidad en programas doctorales”, en Comisión Nacional de Acreditación, Aseguramiento de la calidad de programas de doctorado: convergencias y desafíos para Iberoamérica. Seminario internacional, serie Estudios sobre Acreditación, Santiago, Chile: Comisión Nacional de Acreditación, pp. 7-9.
  39. Murphy, Shelley; McGlynn-Stewart, Monica y Ghafouri, Farveh (2014). “Constructing our identities through a writing support group: Bridging from doctoral students to teacher educator researchers”, Studying Teacher Education, vol. 10, núm. 3, pp. 239- 254. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2014.949656
  40. Navarro, Federico (2010). “¿Qué son los géneros profesionales? Apuntes teórico-metodológicos para el estudio del discurso profesional”, IV Congreso Internacional de Letras, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires: Universidad de Buenos Aires. pp. 1294-1303.
  41. Navarro, Federico (2017). “De la alfabetización academica a la alfabetización disciplinar”, en R. Ibáñez y C. González (eds.), Alfabetización disciplinar en la formación inicial docente. Leer y escribir para aprender, Valparaíso: Ediciones Universitarias de Valparaíso, pp. 7-15.
  42. OECD (2019). Education at a glance 2019, París: OECD Publishing. https://doi. org/10.1787/889e8641-en
  43. Page-Adams, Deborah; Cheng, Li-Chen; Gogineni, Aruna y Shen, Ching-Ying (2009). “Establishing groups to encourage writing for publication among doctoral students”, Journal of Social Work Education, vol. 31, núm. 3, pp. 402-407. https://doi.org/10.1 080/10437797.1995.10672275
  44. Sala-Bubaré, Anna; Peltonen, Jouni; Pyhältö, Kirsi y Castelló, Montserrat (2018). “Doctoral candidates’ research writing perceptions: A cross-national study”, International Journal of Doctoral Studies, vol. 13, pp. 327-345. https://doi. org/10.28945/4103
  45. Simons, Helen (2009). El estudio de caso: teoría y práctica, Madrid: Morata.
  46. Smit, Renee (2012). “Towards a clearer understanding of student disadvantage in higher education: Problematising deficit thinking”, Higher Education Research and Development, vol. 31, núm. 3, pp. 369-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2 011.634383
  47. Stake, Robert (2005). “Qualitative case studies”, en N. Denzin y Y. Lincoln (eds.), The handbook of qualitative research, 3a ed., Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 443-466.
  48. Street, Brian (2003). “What’s “new” in new literacy studies?: Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice”, Current Issues in Comparative Education, vol. 5, núm. 2, pp. 77-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.026
  49. Stubb, Jenni; Pyhältö, Kirsi y Lonka, Kirsti (2011). “Balancing between inspiration and exhaustion: PhD students’ experienced socio-psychological well-being”, Studies in Continuing Education, vol. 33, núm. 1, pp. 33-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/015803 7X.2010.515572
  50. Toulmin, Stephen (1972). Human understanding, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  51. Trigos-Carrillo, Lina (2019a). “A critical sociocultural perspective on academic literacies in latin america”, Íkala, vol. 24, núm. 1, pp. 13-26. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea. ikala.v24n01a10.
  52. Trigos-Carrillo, Lina (2019b). “Community cultural wealth and literacy capital in Latin American communities”, English Teaching: Practice & Critique, vol. 19, núm. 1, pp. 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-05-2019-0071
  53. Unesco-Iesalc (2007). Informe sobre la Educación Superior en América Latina y el Caribe 2000-2005, Caracas: Instituto Internacional de la Unesco para la Educación Superior en América Latina y el Caribe.
  54. White, William y Grinnell, Jason (2011). “The Ed.D. v2.0: Imagining a new doctorate in education”, en Callejo, Fain y Slater (eds.), Higher education and human capital: Re/ thinking the doctorate in America, Roterdam: Sense Publishers, pp. 91-102.
  55. Yin, Robert (2003). Case study research. Design and methods, 3a ed., Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  56. Zavala, Virginia (2011). “La escritura académica y la agencia de los sujetos”, Cuadernos Comillas, vol. 1, pp. 52-66.
  57. Zavala, Virginia (2019). “Justicia sociolingüística para los tiempos de hoy”, Íkala, vol. 24, núm. 2, pp. 343-359. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v24n02a09