Vol. 28 Núm. 98 (2023)
Investigación

AUTORREGULACIÓN DEL APRENDIZAJE, MOTIVACIÓN Y COMPETENCIAS DIGITALES EN EDUCACIÓN A DISTANCIA: Una revisión sistemática

PDF XML
  • Cecilia Pinto Santuber,
  • Mario Bravo Molina,
  • Rodrigo Ortiz Salgado,
  • Daniel Jiménez Gallegos,
  • Tarik Faouzi Nadim
Cecilia Pinto Santuber
Universidad del Bío-Bío
Mario Bravo Molina
Universidad del Bío-Bío
Rodrigo Ortiz Salgado
Universidad del Bío Bío
Daniel Jiménez Gallegos
Universidad del Bío-Bío
Tarik Faouzi Nadim
Universidad de Santiago de Chile

Publicado 2023-07-01

Palabras clave

  • Aprendizaje autorregulado; educación a distancia; aprendizaje virtual; motivación académica; educación superior.

Resumen

Los entornos de enseñanza en línea requieren promover eficazmente la autonomía del aprendizaje, el compromiso activo y el desarrollo de competencias digitales en estudiantes de educación superior. Este trabajo indaga la relación entre estas variables a través de una revisión sistemática de literatura sobre el vínculo entre motivación, autorregulación del aprendizaje y competencia digital. Se realizó una búsqueda de artículos en Web of Science y Scopus, y luego se analizaron cualitativamente con un enfoque temático. Se observaron perspectivas teóricas seminales en común; sin embargo, pocas experiencias abordaron estas dimensiones de manera integrada. Los resultados muestran un desarrollo inicial del estudio del tema en contextos de enseñanza con apoyo de plataformas educativas, reconociendo relaciones bilaterales entre los constructos, con una repercusión relevante en el desempeño académico y la disposición para el aprendizaje.

PDF XML

Citas

  1. Anthonysamy, Lilian; Choo, Koo Ah y Hew, Soon Hin (2020). “Self-regulated learning strategies in higher education: Fostering digital literacy for sustainable lifelong learning”, Education and Information Technologies, vol. 25, núm. 4, pp. 2393-2414. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10639-020-10201-8
  2. Bandura, Albert (1987). Fundamentos sociales del pensamiento y de la acción: una teoría cognoscitiva social, Barcelona, España: Martínez Roca.
  3. Bandura, Albert y Cervone, Daniel (1983). “Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 45, núm. 5, pp. 1017-1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.45.5.1017.
  4. Blau, Ina; Shamir-Inbal, Tamar y Avdiel, Orit (2020). “How does the pedagogical design of a technology-enhanced collaborative academic course promote digital literacies, self-regulation, and perceived learning of students?”, The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 45, 100722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100722
  5. Bolaños, Fernando y Pilerot, Ola (2021). “Digital abilities, between instrumentalization and empowerment: A discourse analysis of Chilean secondary technical and vocational public policy documents”, Journal of Vocational Education & Training, publicado en línea: 31 de agosto. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2021.1973542
  6. Bonetto, Vanesa y Paoloni, Paola (2011). “Las creencias de autoeficacia en alumnos universitarios. Vinculaciones con estrategias de aprendizaje y rendimiento académico”, ponencia presentada en el iii Congreso Internacional de Investigación y Práctica Profesional en Psicología, xviii Jornadas de Investigación y Séptimo Encuentro de Investigadores en Psicología del mercosur. Disponible en: https://www.aacademica. org/000-052/444
  7. Braun, Virginia y Clarke, Victoria (2006). “Using thematic analysis in psychology”, Qualitative Research in Psycholog y, vol. 3, núm. 2, pp. 77-10. https://doi. org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  8. Calvani, Antonio; Fini, Antonio; Ranieri, María y Picci, Patricia (2012). “Are young generations in secondary school digitally competent? A study on Italian teenagers”, Computers & Education, vol. 58, núm. 2, pp. 797-807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. compedu.2011.10.004
  9. Cunningham, Craig y Billingsley, Marty (2003). Curriculum webs: A practical guide to weaving the web into teaching and learning, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  10. Cuthbertson, William y Falcone, Andrea (2014). “Elevating engagement and community in online courses”, Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, vol. 8, núms. 3-4, pp. 216-224. https://10.1080/1533290X.2014.945839
  11. Daniel, Dominique (2014). “Learners with low self-efficacy for information literacy rely on library resources less often but are more willing to learn how to use them”, Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, vol. 9, núm. 3, pp. 101-103. https:// doi.org/10.18438/B82S4T
  12. De Obesso, Mercedes; Núñez-Canal, Margarita y Pérez-Rivero, Carlos Alberto (2023). “How do students perceive educators’ digital competence in higher education?” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 188, núm. 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. techfore.2022.122284
  13. Deci, Edward y Ryan, Richard (2008). “Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development and health”, Canadian Psychology, vol. 49, núm. 3, pp. 183-185. https:// 10.1037/a0012801
  14. Ferrari, Anusca (2012). Digital competence in practice: An analysis of frameworks, Comisión Europea: Centro Común de Investigación-Instituto de Estudios de Prospectiva Tecnológica. https://doi.org/10.2791/82116
  15. Flierl, Michael; Bonem, Emily; Maybee, Clarence y Fundator, Rachel (2018). “Information literacy supporting student motivation and performance: Course-level analyses”, Library & Information Science Research, vol. 40, núm. 1, pp. 30-37. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.lisr.2018.03.001
  16. From, Jorgen (2017). “Pedagogical digital competence-Between values, knowledge and skills”, Higher Education Studies, vol. 7, núm. 2, pp. 43-50. Disponible en: https:// eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1140642
  17. Gamiz-Sánchez, Vanesa y Gallego-Arrufat, María José (2016). “Modelo de análisis de metodologías didácticas semipresenciales en educación superior”, Educación xx1, vol. 19, núm. 1, pp. 39-61. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/706/70643085002.pdf
  18. García, Mayra; Gutiérrez, Viridiana; Rayas, Jessica y Vásquez, Ángel (2020). “Los efectos de la temática socioambiental en las habilidades de pensamiento crítico del futuro profesorado de primaria”, Tecné, Episteme y Didaxis, núm. 48. https://doi.org/10. 17227/ted.num48-12382
  19. Güneş, İbrahim; Özsoy-Güneş, Zeliha y Kırbaşlar, Merve (2015). “Investigation of the effects of educational internet use self-efficacy beliefs and self-regulated learning skills over information literacy”, The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 2, núm. 1, pp. 329-336. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3Wbopnu.
  20. Harsiati, Titik; Pradana, Ilham y Amrullah, Harris (2019). “Information literacy and self-regulation in the context of the creative thinking of prospective engineers”, World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, vol. 17, núm. 2, pp. 197-203. Disponible en: http://www.wiete.com.au/journals/WTE&TE/Pages/Vol.17,%20 No.2%20(2019)/13-Harsiati-T.pdf
  21. He, Tao; Zhu, Chang y Questier, Frederik (2018). “Predicting digital informal learning: an empirical study among Chinese university students”, Asia Pacific Education Review, vol. 19, núm. 1, pp. 79-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9517-x
  22. He, Tao; Huang, Quionhao; Yu, Xiaofeng y Shihua, Li (2021). “Exploring students’ digital informal learning: the roles of digital competence and dtpb factors”, Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 40, núm. 13, pp. 1406-1416. https://doi.org/10.1080/0 144929X.2020.1752800
  23. Heng, Loh Kah y Mansor, Yushiana (2010). “Impact of information literacy training on academic self-efficacy and learning performance of university students in a problem-based learning environment”, Pertanika Journal of Social Science & Humanities, vol. 18, núm. 2, pp. 121-134. Disponible en: https://myjurnal.mohe.gov.my/public/ article-view.php?id=12455
  24. Houtman, Evelin (2015). “Mind-blowing: Fostering self-regulated learning in information literacy instruction”, Communications in Information Literacy, vol. 9, núm. 1. Disponible en: http://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/22382.
  25. Jerez Yáñez, Oscar; Orsini Sánchez, César y Hasbún Held, Beatriz (2016). “Atributos de una docencia de calidad en la educación superior: una revisión sistemática”, Estudios Pedagógicos (Valdivia), vol. 42, núm. 3, pp. 483-506. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/ S0718-07052016000400026
  26. Klipfel, Kevin Michael (2014). “Authentic engagement: Assessing the effects of authenticity on student engagement and information literacy in academic library instruction”, Reference Services Review, vol. 42, núm. 2. https://doi.org/10.1108/ RSR-08-2013-0043
  27. Ku, David y Chang, Chiung (2011). “The effect of academic discipline and gender difference on Taiwanese college students’ learning styles and strategies in web-based learning environments”, Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 10, núm. 3, pp. 265-272. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ944991.
  28. Lee, Jeongmin; Moon, Jiyoon y Cho, Boram (2015). “The mediating role of self-regulation between digital literacy and learning outcomes in the digital textbook for middle school English”, Educational Technology International, vol. 16, núm. 1, pp. 58-83. Disponible en: https://koreascience.kr/article/JAKO201512359828224.pdf
  29. Lerdpornkulrat, Thanita; Poondej, Chanut; Koul, Ravinder; Khiawrod, Gerdsaraporn y Prasertsirikul, Pariyanuch (2017). “The positive effect of intrinsic feedback on motivational engagement and self-efficacy in information literacy”, Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, vol. 37, núm. 4, pp. 421-434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282917747423
  30. MacMillan, Freya; McBride, Kate; George, Emma y Steiner, Genevieve (2019). “Conducting a systematic review: A practical guide”, en P. Liamputtong (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences, Singapur: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 981-10-5251-4_113
  31. Mehrvarz, Mahboobe; Heidari, Elham; Farrokhnia, Mohammadreza y Noroozi, Omid (2021). “The mediating role of digital informal learning in the relationship between students’ digital competence and their academic performance”, Computers & Education, vol. 167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104184
  32. Mon, Francesc Esteve y Cervera, Mercè Gisberty (2013). “Competencia digital en la educación superior: instrumentos de evaluación y nuevos entornos”, Enl@ce: Revista Venezolana de Información, Tecnología y Conocimiento, vol. 10, núm. 3, pp. 29-43. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/823/82329477003.pdf
  33. Pedaste, Margus; Leijen, Äli; Saks, Katrin; De Jong, Ton y Gillet, Denis (2017). “How to link pedagogy, technology and stem learning?”, en 25th International Conference on Computers in Education, pp. 579-586. Disponible en: https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/ portalfiles/portal/102269516/How_to_link_pedagogy_technology_and_STEM_ learning.pdf
  34. Pinto, Maria y Fernández-Pascual, Rosaura (2017). “How a cycle of information literacy assessment and instruction stimulates attitudes and motivations of LIS students: A competency-based case study”, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, vol. 51, núm. 2, pp. 370-386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000617742447
  35. Pintrich, Paul (2004). “A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students”, Educational Psychology Review, vol. 16, núm.4, pp. 385- 407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
  36. Rajagopal, Kamakshi; Firssova, Olga; De Beeck, Ilse Op; Van der Stappen, Elke; Stoyanov, Slavi; Henderikx, Piet y Buchem, Ilona (2020). “Learner skills in open virtual mobility”, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 28. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2254
  37. Ross, Mitchell; Perkins, Helen y Bodey, Kelli (2013). “Information literacy self-efficacy: The effect of juggling work and study”, Library & Information Science Research, vol. 35, núm. 4, pp. 279-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2013.04.008
  38. Ross, Mitchell; Perkins, Helen y Bodey, Kelli (2016). “Academic motivation and information literacy self-efficacy: The importance of a simple desire to know”, Library & Information Science Research, vol. 38, núm. 1, pp. 2-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2016.01.002.
  39. Ryan, Richard M. y Deci, Edward L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness, Nueva York: The Guilford Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1521/978.14625/28806
  40. Salamonson, Yenna; Ramjan, Lucie; Van den Nieuwenhuizen, Simon; Metcalfe, Lauren; Chang, Sungwon y Everett, Bronwyn (2016). “Sense of coherence, self-regulated learning and academic performance in first year nursing students: A cluster analysis approach”, Nurse Education in Practice, vol. 17, pp. 208-213. Disponible en: https:// pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26804936/
  41. Tang, Yingqi y Tseng, Hung Wei (2013). “Distance learners’ self-efficacy and information literacy skills”, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 39, núm. 6, pp. 517-521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2013.08.008
  42. Taylor, Shirley y Todd, Peter (1995). “Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models”, Information Systems Research, vol. 6, núm. 2, pp. 144-176. Disponible en: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23011007
  43. Vosniadou, Stella (2020). “Bridging secondary and higher education. The importance of self-regulated learning”, European Review, vol. 28, núm. S1, pp. S94-S103. https:// doi.org/10.1017/S1062798720000939
  44. Zimmerman, Barry J. (2002), “Becoming a self–regulated learner: an overview”, Theory into Practice, vol. 41, núm. 2, pp. 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
  45. Zimmerman, Barry J., y Schunk, Dale H. (2011). “Self-regulated learning and performance”, en B. J. Zimmerman, y D. H. Schunk (eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance, Nueva York: Routledge, pp. 1-12.