Vol. 26 Núm. 88 (2021)
Investigación

RELACIONES ENTRE APOYO DOCENTE, EMOCIONES MORALES Y CONDUCTA PROSOCIAL EN ADOLESCENTES ESPECTADORES DE BULLYING

PDF XML
  • Carolina Alcántar Nieblas,
  • Ángel Alberto Valdés Cuervo,
  • Francisco José Álvarez-Montero,
  • Hiram Reyes-Sosa
Carolina Alcántar Nieblas
Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa
Ángel Alberto Valdés Cuervo
Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora
Francisco José Álvarez-Montero
Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa
Hiram Reyes-Sosa
Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila

Publicado 2021-01-01

Palabras clave

  • Empatía; bullying; emociones; conducta prosocial; papel del profesor.

Resumen

Este estudio examina las relaciones directas e indirectas entre apoyo docente, compa­sión, empatía y conducta prosocial de espectadores en el bullying; además, analiza la moderación del sexo del estudiante en las relaciones entre las variables. Participaron 998 adolescentes (M= 13.87, DE = 1.09 años), 517 (51.5%) hombres y 481 (48.5%) mujeres. Se calculó un modelo de ecuaciones estructurales. Entre los resultados se encontró que el apoyo docente se relaciona directamente con la conducta prosocial de los espectadores. También se halló que este apoyo favorece indirectamente la con­ducta prosocial a través de sus efectos positivos en las emociones morales. Un análisis multigrupo mostró que el sexo del estudiante no modera las relaciones propuestas en el modelo. Se concluyó que el apoyo docente favorece la conducta prosocial hacia las víctimas de bullying.

PDF XML

Citas

  1. Albores-Gallo, Lilia; Sauceda-García, Juan Manuel; Ruiz-Velasco, Silvia y Roque-Santiago, Eduardo (2011). “El acoso escolar (bullying) y su asociación con trastornos psiquiátricos en una muestra de escolares mexicanos”, Salud Pública de México, vol. 53, núm. 3, pp. 220-277. Disponible en: medigraphic.com/pdfs/salpubmex/sal-2011/sal113d.pdf (consultado: 12 de octubre de 2018)
  2. Alcántar Nieblas, Carolina; Valdés Cuervo, Ángel Alberto; Carlos Martínez, Ernesto Alonso; Martínez Ferrer, Belén y García Vázquez, Fernanda Inéz (2018). “Propiedades psicométricas de la adaptación al español de la Participant Role Approach (pra)”, Revista Colombiana de Psicología, vol. 27, núm, 2, pp. 177-192. DOI: 10.15446/rcp. v27n2.68721
  3. Bautista Hernández, Gildardo; Vera Noriega, José Ángel y Tánori Quintana, Jesús (2019). “Shame, empathy, coping and school safety of the bystanders in bullying situations of bullying”, Trends in Psychology, vol. 27, núm. 2, pp. 357-369. DOI: 10.9788/TP2019.2-05
  4. Bautista Hernández, Gildardo; Vera Noriega, José Ángel; Tánori Quintana, Jesús y Valdés Cuervo, Ángel Alberto (2016). “Propiedades psicométricas de una escala para medir empatía en estudiantes de secundaria”, Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, vol. 16, núm. 3, pp. 1-20. DOI: 10.15517/aje.v16i3.25959
  5. Benita, Moti; Levkovitz, Tal y Roth, Guy (2017). “Integrative emotion regulation predicts adolescents’ prosocial behavior through the mediation of empathy”, Learning and Instruction, vol. 50, pp. 14-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.11.004
  6. Bokhorst, Caroline E.; Sumter, Sindy y Westenberg, Michiel (2010). “Social support from parents, friends, classmates, and teachers in children and adolescents aged 9 to 18 years: Who is perceived as most supportive?”, Social Development, vol. 19, núm. 2, pp. 417-426. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00540.x
  7. Boulton, Michael J; Murphy, Debborah; Lloyd, Julie; Besling, Sabine; Coote, Jennifer; Lewis, Jennifer; Perrin, Roxanne y Walsh, Linda (2013). “Helping counts: predicting children's intentions to disclose being bullied to teachers from prior social support experiences”, British Educational Research Journal, vol. 39, núm. 2, pp. 209-221. DOI: 10.1080/01411926.2011.627420
  8. Bronfenbrenner, Urie (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  9. Byrne, Barbara (2016). Structural equation modeling with amos. Basic concepts, applications, and programming, 3a ed., Nueva York: Routledge.
  10. Carlo, Gustavo (2014). “The development and correlates of prosocial moral behaviors”, en M. Killen y J. G. Smetana (eds.), Handbook of moral development, 2a ed., Nueva York: Psychology Press, pp. 208-234.
  11. Cheon, J y MacKinnon, D. (2012). “Mediation/indirect effects in structural equation modeling”, en R. H. Hoyle (ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling, Nueva York: The Guilford Press, pp. 417-435.
  12. Chester, Kayleigh L; Callaghan, Mary; Cosma, Alina; Donnelly, Peter; Craig, Wendy; Walsh, Sophie y Molcho, Michal (2015). “Cross-national time trends in bullying victimization in 33 countries among children aged 11, 13 and 15 from 2002 to 2010”, The European Journal of Public Health, vol. 25, núm. 2, pp. 61-64. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv029
  13. Cowie, Helen (2014). “Understanding the role of bystanders and peer support in school bullying”, The International Journal of Emotional Education, vol. 6, núm. 1, pp. 26- 32. Disponible en: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1085728.pdf (consultado: 12 de mayo de 2019).
  14. Daniel, Ella; Dys, Sebastian P; Buchmann, Marlis y Malti, Tina (2014). “Developmental relations between sympathy, moral emotions attributions, moral reasoning, and social justice values from childhood to early-adolescence”, Journal of Adolescence, vol. 37, núm. 7, pp. 1201-1214. DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.08.009
  15. De Guzman, Maria Rosario; Jung Eunju y Do, K. Anh (2012). “Perceived social support networks and prosocial outcomes among Latino/a youth in the United States”, Interamerican Journal Psychology, vol. 46, núm. 3, pp. 413-424. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=28425871010 (consultado: 6 de marzo de 2019).
  16. Demaray, Michelle Kilpatrick; Summers, Kelly; Jenkins, Lyndsay y Becker, Lisa (2016). “Bullying Participant Behaviors Questionnaire (BPBQ). Establishing a reliable and valid measure”, Journal of School Violence, vol. 15, pp. 158-188. DOI: 10.1080/153.88220.2014.964801
  17. Eisenberg, Nancy (2000). “Emotion, regulation, and moral development”, Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 51, pp. 665-697. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych. 51.1.665
  18. Eisenberg, Nancy; Eggum, Natalie y Di Giunta, Laura (2010). “Empathy-related responding: Associations with prosocial behavior, aggression, and intergroup relations”, Social Issues and Policy Review, vol. 4, núm. 1, pp. 143-180. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751- 2409.2010.01020.x
  19. Fierro-Evans, Cecilia y Carbajal-Padilla, Patricia (2019). “Convivencia escolar: una revisión del concepto”, Psicoperspectivas, vol. 18, núm. 1, pp. 1-14. DOI: 10.5027/ psico perspectivas-vol18- issue1-fulltext-1486
  20. Fierro, M. Cecilia; Tapia, Guillermo; Fortoul, Bertha; Martínez-Parente, Regina; Macouzet, Mónica y Jiménez Muñoz-Ledo, Martha (2013). “Conversando sobre la convivencia en la escuela: una guía para el auto-diagnóstico de la convivencia escolar desde la perspectivas docentes”, Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa, vol. 6, núm. 2, pp. 103-214. Disponible en: http://revistas.uam.es/index.php/riee/article/view/3407 (consultado: 20 de mayo 2018).
  21. Garandeau, Claire; Vartio, Annina; Poskiparta, Elisa y Salmivalli, Christina (2016). “School bullies’ intention to change behavior following teacher interventions: Effects of empathy arousal, condemning of bullying, and blaming of the perpetrator”, Prevention Science, vol. 17, núm. 8, pp.1034-1043. DOI: 10.1007/s11121-016-0712-x
  22. García-Vázquez, Fernanda Inéz; Valdés-Cuervo, Ángel Alberto; Martínez-Ferrer, Belén y Parra-Pérez, Lizeth Guadalupe (2020). “Forgiveness, gratitude, happiness, and prosocial bystander behavior in bullying”, Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 10. DOI: 10.3389/ fpsyg.2019.02827
  23. Gibbs, John C. (2014). Moral development and reality. Beyond the theories of Kohlberg, Hoffman, and Haidt, 3a ed., Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
  24. Gini, Gianluca; Pozzoli, Tiziana; Borghi, Francesco y Franzoni, Lara (2008). “The role of bystanders in students’ perception of bullying and sense of safety”, Journal of School Psychology, vol. 46, núm. 6, pp. 617-638. DOI: 10.1016/j.j sp.2008.02.001
  25. Goetz, Jennifer; Keltner, Dacher y Simon-Thomas, Emiliana (2010). “Compassion: An evolutionary analysis and empirical review”, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 136, núm. 3, pp. 351-374. DOI: 10.1037/a0018807
  26. Gómez-Nashiki, Antonio (2016). “Estrategias de docente en contra de la violencia escolar en escuelas primarias y secundarias de Colima, México”, Aula, vol. 22, pp. 321-339. DOI: 10.14201/aula201622321339
  27. Haro Solís, Israel y García Cabrero, Benilde (2014). “Variables emocionales y sociomorales asociadas con el tipo de rol que asumen los alumnos y alumnas en el maltrato entre iguales”, Apuntes de Psicología, vol. 32, núm, 1, pp.15-23.
  28. Hendrickx, Marloes M. H. G; Mainhard, M. Tim; Boor-Klip, Henrique J.; Cillessen, Antonius H. M. y Brekelmans, Mieke (2016). “Social dynamics in the classroom: teacher support and conflict and the peer ecology”, Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 53, pp. 30-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2015.10.004
  29. Hupcey, Judith E. (1998). “Clarifying the social support theory-research”, Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 27, núm. 6, pp. 1231-1241. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-26 48.1998.01231.x
  30. Instituto Nacional de Geografía y Estadística (2015). Encuesta de cohesión social para la prevención de la violencia y la delincuencia, Ciudad de México: Instituto Nacional de Geografía y Estadística.
  31. Jenkins, Lyndsay N y Nickerson, Amanda B. (2017). “Bullying participant roles and gender as predictors of bystander intervention”, Aggressive Behavior, vol. 43, núm. 3, pp. 281-290. DOI: 10.1002/ab.21688
  32. Jungert, Tomas; Piroddi, Barbara y Thornberg, Robert (2016). “Early adolescents’ motivations to defend victims in school bullying and their perceptions of student-teacher relationships: A self-determination theory approach”, Journal of Adolescence, vol. 53, pp. 75-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.09.001
  33. Kärnä, Antti; Voeten, Marinus; Little, Todd D; Alanen, Erkki; Poskiparta, Elisa y Salmivalli, Christina (2013). “Effectiveness of the KiVa antibullying program: Grades 1-3 and 7-9”, Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 105, núm. 2, pp. 535-551. DOI: 10.1037/ a0030417
  34. Kline, Rex B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 4a ed., Nueva York: The Guilford Press.
  35. Koyanagi, Ai; Oh, Hans; Carvalho, Andre; Smith, Lee; Haro, Josep Maria; Vancampfort, Davy; Stubbs, Brendon y DeVylder, Jordan E. (2019). “Bullying victimization and suicide attempt among adolescents aged 12-15 years from 48 countries”, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, vol. 58, núm. 9, pp. 907-918. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.20 18.10.018
  36. Lakey, Brian y Cohen, Sheldon (2000). “Social support theory and measurement”, en S. Cohen; L. G. Underwood y B. H. Gottlied (eds.), Social support measurement and intervention, Nueva York: Oxford University Press, pp. 29-52
  37. Lambe, Laura J; Cioppa, Victoria Della; Hong, Irene K. y Craig, Wendy M. (2019). “Standing up to bullying: A social ecological review of peer defending in offline and online contexts”, Aggression and Violent Behavior, vol. 45, pp. 51-74. DOI: 10.1016/j. avb.2018.05.007
  38. Lietaert, Sofie; Roorda, Debora; Laevers, Ferre; Verschueren, Karine y De Fraine, Bieke (2015). “The gender gap in student engagement: The role of teachers’ autonomy support, structure, and involvement”, British Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 85, núm. 4, pp. 498-518. DOI: 10.1111/bjep.12095
  39. Luengo Kanacri, Bernadette P.; Eisenberg, Nancy; Thartori, Eriona; Pastorelli, Concetta; Uribe Tirado, Liliana M.; Gerbino, Maria y Caprara, Gian V. (2017). “Longitudinal relations among positivity, perceived positive school climate, and prosocial behaviors in Colombian adolescents”, Child Development, vol. 88, núm. 4, pp. 1100-1114. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12863
  40. Machillot, Didier (2017). “Normas sociales, estereotipos, discriminación y violencia entre pares”, Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, vol. 22, núm. 72, pp. 209-227.
  41. Malecki, Christine Kerres y Demaray, Michelle Kilpatrick (2002). “Measuring perceived social support: Development of the Child and Adolescent Social Support Scale (CASSS)”, Psychology in the Schools, vol. 39, núm. 1, pp. 1-18. DOI: 10.1002/ pits.10004
  42. Malti, Tina y Ongley Sophia F. (2014). “The development moral emotions and moral reasoning”, en M. Killen y J. Smetana (eds.), Handbook of moral development, Nueva York: Psychological Press, pp. 163-183.
  43. McDougall, Patricia y Vaillancourt, Tracy (2015). “Long-term adult outcomes of peer victimization in childhood and adolescence”, American Psychologist, vol. 70, núm. 4, pp. 300-310. DOI: 10.1037/a0039174
  44. Migliaccio, Todd (2015). “Teacher engagement with bullying: Managing and identity within a school”, Sociological Spectrum: Mid-south Sociological Association, vol. 35, núm. 1, pp. 84-108. DOI: 10.1080/02732173.2014.978430
  45. Moore, Sophie E; Norman, Rosana E.; Suetani, Schuichi; Thomas, Hannah J; Sly, Peter D. y Scott, J G (2017). “Consequences of bullying victimization in childhood and adolescence: A systematic review and meta-analysis”, World Journal of Psychiatry”, vol. 7, núm. 1, pp. 60-76. DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v7i1.60
  46. Nickerson, Amanda y Mele-Taylor, Danielle (2014). “Empathetic responsiveness, group norms, and prosocial affiliations in bullying roles”, School Psychology Quarterly, vol. 29, núm. 1, pp. 99-109. DOI: 10.1037/spq0000052
  47. Nishina, Adrienne y Juvonen, Jaana (2005). “Daily reports of witnessing and experiencing peer harassment in middle school”, Child Development, vol. 76, núm. 2, pp. 435- 450. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00855.x
  48. Organisation for Cooperation and Economic Development (2017). PISA 2015 Results (vol. III): Students’ well-being, París: Organisation for Cooperation and Economic
  49. Pronk, Jeroen; Olthof, Tjeert y Goossens, Frits A. (2015). “Differential personality correlates of early adolescents’ bullying-related outsider and defender behavior”, The Journal of Early Adolescence, vol. 35, núm. 8, pp. 1069-1091. DOI: 10.1177/0272431614549628
  50. Reyes Rodríguez, Ana Carolina; Vera Noriega, José Ángel y Valdés Cuervo, Ángel Alberto (2017). “Teaching practices, school support and bullying”, World Journal of Education, vol. 7, núm. 4, pp. 50-59. DOI: 10.5430/wje.v7n4p50
  51. Rueger, Sandra Yu; Malecki, Christine Kerres y Demaray, Michelle Kilpatrick (2010). “Relationship between multiple sources of perceived social support and psychological and academic adjustment in early adolescence: Comparisons across gender”, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, vol. 39, núm. 1, pp. 47-61. DOI: 10.1007/s10964- 008-9368-6
  52. Saarento, Silja; Boulton, Aaron y Salmivalli Christina (2015). “Reducing bullying and victimization: Student- and classroom- level mechanisms of change”, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, vol. 43, pp. 61-76. DOI: 10.1007/s10802-013-9841-x
  53. Salmivalli, Christina; Voeten, Marinus y Poskiparta, Elisa (2011). “Bystanders matter: Associations between reinforcing, defending, and the frequency of bullying behavior in classrooms”, Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, vol. 40, núm. 5, pp. 668-676. DOI: 10.1080/15374416.2011.597090
  54. Schweder, Sabine y Raufelder, Diana (2019). “Positive emotions, learning behavior and teacher support in self-directed learning during adolescence: Do age and gender matter”, Journal of Adolescence, vol. 73, pp. 73-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2019. 04.004
  55. Secretaría de Educación Pública (2019). La nueva escuela escuela mexicana: principios y orientaciones pedagógicas, Ciudad de México: Secretaría de Educación Pública.
  56. Sutton, Jon y Smith, Peter K. (1999). “Bullying as a group process: An adaptation of the participant role approach”, Aggressive Behavior, vol. 25, núm. 2, pp. 97-111. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1999)25:2<97::AID-AB3>3.0CO;2-7
  57. Swearer, Susan y Hymel, Shelley (2015). “Understanding the psychology of bullying: Moving toward a social-ecological diathesis-stress model”, American Psychologist, vol. 70, núm. 4, pp. 344-353. DOI: 10.1037/a0038929
  58. Tangney, June Price; Stuewig, Jeff y Mashek, Debra J. (2007). “Moral emotions and moral behavior”, Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 58, núm. 1, pp. 345-372. DOI: 10.1146/ annurev.psych.56.091103.070145
  59. Tardy, Charles (1985). “Social support measurement”, American Journal of Community Psychology, vol. 13, núm. 2, pp. 187-202. DOI: 10.1007/BF00905728
  60. Thornberg, Robert; Tenenbaum, Laura; Varjas, Kris; Meyers, Joel; Jungert, Tomas y Vanegas, Gina (2012). “Bystander motivation in bullying incidents: To intervene or not intervene”, Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 13, núm. 3, pp. 247-25. DOI: 105811/westjem.2012.3.11792
  61. Thornberg, Robert y Jungert, Tomas (2013). “Bystander behavior in bullying situations: Basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement and defender self-efficacy”, Journal of Adolescence, vol. 36, pp. 475-483. DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.02.003
  62. Thornberg, Robert; Wänström, Linda; Hong, Jun y Espelage, Dorothy L. (2017). “Classroom relationship qualities and social-cognitive correlates of defending and passive bystanding in school bullying in Sweden: A multilevel analysis”, Journal of School Psychology, vol. 63, pp. 49-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2017.03.002
  63. Twemlow, Stuart; Fonagy, Peter y Sacco, Frank C. (2004). “The role of the bystander in the social architecture of bullying and violence in schools and communities”, Annals New York Academy of Science, vol. 1036, núm. 1, pp. 215-232. DOI: 10.1196/ annals.1330.014
  64. Valdés Cuervo, Ángel Alberto y Carlos Martínez, Ernesto Alonso (2017). “Relación entre disciplina parental restaurativa, manejo de la vergüenza, compasión y acoso escolar”, Revista Mexicana de Psicología, vol. 34, núm. 1, pp. 37-45. Disponible en: https://www. redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=243056045004 (consultado: 20 de enero 2018).
  65. Valdés-Cuervo, Ángel Alberto; Alcántar-Nieblas, Carolina; Martínez-Ferrer, Belén y Parra-Pérez, Lizeth (2018). “Relations between restorative parental discipline, family climate, parental support, empathy, shame, and defender in bullying”, Children and Youth Services Review, vol. 95, pp. 152-159. DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.10.015
  66. Valdés-Cuervo, Ángel Alberto; Martínez-Ferrer, Belén y Carlos-Martínez, Ernesto Alonso (2018). “El rol de las prácticas docentes en la prevención de la violencia escolar entre pares”, Revista de Psicodidáctica, vol. 23, núm. 1, pp. 33-38. DOI: 10.1016/j. psicod.2017.05.006
  67. Valdés Cuervo, Ángel Alberto; Tánori Quintana, Jesús; Carlos Martínez, Ernesto Alonso y Wendlandt Amezaga, Teodoro Rafael (2018). “Challenging behavior, parental conflict and community violence in students with aggressive behavior”, International Journal of Psychological Research, vol. 11, núm. 1, pp. 50-57. DOI: 10.21500/20112084.1777
  68. Van der Graaff, Jolien; Carlo, Gustavo; Crocetti, Elizabetta; Koot, Hans y Branje, Susan (2018). “Prosocial behavior in adolescence: Gender differences in development and links with empathy”, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, vol. 47, núm. 5, pp. 1086-1099. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-017-0786-1
  69. Vivolo-Kantor, Alana M; Martell, Brandi N.; Holland, Kristin y Westby, Ruth (2014). “A systematic review and content analysis of bullying and cyber-bullying measurement strategies”, Aggression and Violent Behavior, vol. 19, núm. 4, pp. 423-434. DOI: 10.1016/j.avb.2014.06-008
  70. Volk, Anthony A; Dane, Andrew y Zopito, Marini (2014). “What is bullying? A theoretical redefinition”, Developmental Review, vol. 34, núm. 4, pp. 327-343. DOI: 10.1016/j. dr.2014.09.001
  71. Waasdorp, Tracy Evian y Bradshaw, Catherine P (2018). “Examining variation in adolescent bystanders’ responses to bullying”, School Psychology Review, vol. 47, núm. 1, pp. 18- 33. DOI: 10.17105/SPR-2017-0081.V47-1
  72. Wentzel, Kathryn; Battle, Ann; Russell, Shannon y Looney, Lisa B. (2010). “Social support from teachers and peers as predictor of academic and social motivation”, Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 35, núm. 3, pp. 193-202. DOI: 10.1016/j. cedpsych.2010.03.002
  73. Wood, Laura; Smith, Jenifer; Varjas, Kris y Meyers, Joel (2017). “School personnel social support and nonsupport for bystanders of bullying: Exploring student perspectives”, Journal of School Psychology, vol. 61, pp. 1-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2016.12.003